Porovnať metódy
Prezrite si vybrané metódy vedľa seba; riadky, ktoré sa líšia, sú zvýraznené.
| EJ Screening Index (EJScreen-Style)× | Livelihood Vulnerability Index× | |
|---|---|---|
| Odbor | Environmental Sociology | Environmental Sociology |
| Rodina | MCDM | MCDM |
| Rok vzniku≠ | 2015 | 2009 |
| Tvorca≠ | U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EJScreen team) | Micah B. Hahn, Anne M. Riederer & Stanley O. Foster |
| Typ≠ | Composite percentile index combining environmental and demographic indicators | Composite indicator of household climate vulnerability |
| Pôvodný zdroj≠ | U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2024). EJScreen Technical Documentation for Version 2.3. Washington, DC: U.S. EPA. link ↗ | Hahn, M. B., Riederer, A. M., & Foster, S. O. (2009). The Livelihood Vulnerability Index: A pragmatic approach to assessing risks from climate variability and change-A case study in Mozambique. Global Environmental Change, 19(1), 74-88. DOI ↗ |
| Ďalšie názvy | Environmental Justice Index, EJ Composite Indicator, EJScreen Index, Cumulative Environmental Burden Index | LVI, Hahn Livelihood Vulnerability Index, LVI-IPCC, Composite Livelihood Vulnerability Assessment |
| Príbuzné≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Zhrnutie≠ | An EJ screening index is a composite indicator that combines an environmental burden measure with a demographic vulnerability measure to flag communities that experience both high pollution and concentrations of low-income residents and people of color. The canonical implementation is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's EJScreen tool, whose technical documentation specifies how each environmental indicator is paired with a demographic index and converted into a nationwide percentile. The method is deliberately a screening device rather than a definitive measure: it is meant to surface places that warrant a closer look, not to settle exposure or causation. Each EJ index multiplies an environmental indicator by the gap between local and national demographic disadvantage, so that both high pollution and high vulnerability are required to score highly. Percentile ranking then makes otherwise incommensurable indicators comparable across the country. The result is a transparent, reproducible map of potential environmental justice concern. | The Livelihood Vulnerability Index (LVI) is a composite-indicator method for assessing the vulnerability of households and communities to climate variability and change, developed by Micah Hahn, Anne Riederer and Stanley Foster in a 2009 case study in Mozambique. It is built from household survey data organized into major components — typically socio-demographic profile, livelihood strategies, social networks, health, food, water, and exposure to natural disasters and climate variability — each composed of standardized sub-indicators. These are normalized to a common scale, averaged into sub-components and weighted major components, and aggregated into an overall index. A companion formulation, the LVI-IPCC, reorganizes the same indicators into the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's contributing factors of exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity, offering a pragmatic, data-driven way to compare vulnerability across places and to target adaptation. |
| ScholarGateDátová sada ↗ |
|
|