Porovnať metódy
Prezrite si vybrané metódy vedľa seba; riadky, ktoré sa líšia, sú zvýraznené.
| Komparatívna zakotvená teória× | Komparatívny naratívny výskum× | |
|---|---|---|
| Odbor | Kvalitatívne metódy | Kvalitatívne metódy |
| Rodina | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Rok vzniku≠ | 1967 (base); comparative application formalised from the 1980s onward | 1990s–2000s |
| Tvorca≠ | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss (grounded theory base); comparative extension developed by multiple scholars | D. Jean Clandinin & F. Michael Connelly (narrative inquiry); comparative extension by the broader qualitative comparative tradition |
| Typ | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative comparative research design |
| Pôvodný zdroj≠ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607 | Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787943523 |
| Ďalšie názvy | cross-site grounded theory, multi-group grounded theory, comparative GT, grounded theory comparative analysis | comparative narrative inquiry, cross-case narrative research, narrative comparison, comparative narrative analysis |
| Príbuzné | 6 | 6 |
| Zhrnutie≠ | Comparative grounded theory applies the systematic inductive logic of grounded theory across two or more distinct groups, settings, or time points. Rather than generating a theory grounded in a single context, it builds theory that explains variation and similarity across contexts, producing conceptually richer and more transferable explanatory frameworks than single-site grounded theory studies. | Comparative narrative research is a qualitative design that collects personal stories or life accounts from two or more participants, groups, or contexts and systematically compares them to reveal patterns, contrasts, and contextual influences. Drawing on narrative inquiry's attention to experience-as-story, it adds a deliberate comparative logic to identify what is shared, what diverges, and why differences emerge across cases. |
| ScholarGateDátová sada ↗ |
|
|