ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnať metódy

Prezrite si vybrané metódy vedľa seba; riadky, ktoré sa líšia, sú zvýraznené.

Objektívne váženie pomocou korelácie kritérií a smerodajnej odchýlky×Metóda Additive Ratio Assessment×
OdborRozhodovanieRozhodovanie
RodinaMCDMMCDM
Rok vzniku20102010
TvorcaWang, Y. M., Luo, Y.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
TypCorrelation-penalised standard-deviation weightingAdditive utility ratio (optimal reference row)
Pôvodný zdrojWang, Y. M., Luo, Y. (2010). Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗
Ďalšie názvy
Príbuzné88
ZhrnutieCCSD (Criteria Correlation and Standard Deviation objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDátová sada
  1. v1
  2. 1 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Prejsť na hľadanie Stiahnuť snímky

ScholarGatePorovnať metódy: CCSD · ARAS. Získané 2026-06-17 z https://scholargate.app/sk/compare