Porovnať metódy
Prezrite si vybrané metódy vedľa seba; riadky, ktoré sa líšia, sú zvýraznené.
| Bookmark Standard Setting× | Angoff Standard Setting× | Teória odozvy položky (IRT)× | Vertical Scaling× | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odbor≠ | Education | Education | Psychometria | Education |
| Rodina≠ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Rok vzniku≠ | 2001 | 1971 | 1952–1968 | 2014 |
| Tvorca≠ | Howard Mitzel, Daniel Lewis, Richard Patz & Donald Ross Green (CTB/McGraw-Hill) | William H. Angoff | Frederic M. Lord (and Allan Birnbaum for the 2PL/3PL models) | Educational measurement tradition (Thurstone; Kolen & Brennan synthesis) |
| Typ≠ | IRT-based standard-setting procedure using ordered item booklets | Test-centered standard-setting procedure for establishing cut scores | Probabilistic measurement model | Construction of a single developmental score scale spanning multiple grades |
| Pôvodný zdroj≠ | Cizek, G. J., & Bunch, M. B. (2007). Standard Setting: A Guide to Establishing and Evaluating Performance Standards on Tests. Sage. ISBN: 9781412916820 | Cizek, G. J., & Bunch, M. B. (2007). Standard Setting: A Guide to Establishing and Evaluating Performance Standards on Tests. Sage. ISBN: 9781412916820 | Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Addison-Wesley. link ↗ | Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2014). Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking: Methods and Practices (3rd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 9781493903160 |
| Ďalšie názvy | Bookmark Method, Bookmark Procedure, Item Mapping Standard Setting, Ordered Item Booklet Method | Angoff Method, Modified Angoff Method, Yes/No Angoff, Angoff Cut-Score Procedure | IRT, latent trait theory, item characteristic curve theory, modern test theory | Developmental Scaling, Vertical Linking, Cross-Grade Scaling, Growth Scale Construction |
| Príbuzné≠ | 3 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
| Zhrnutie≠ | The Bookmark method is an item-response-theory-based standard-setting procedure in which test items are arranged in a booklet ordered from easiest to hardest. Panelists page through this ordered item booklet and place a 'bookmark' at the point separating items a borderline examinee would likely master from those they would not, judged against a fixed response probability (commonly two-thirds). The latent ability at the bookmark defines the cut score. Developed at CTB/McGraw-Hill, it became one of the dominant methods for large-scale K-12 assessments. | The Angoff method is a test-centered procedure for establishing a passing score (cut score) on an examination. A panel of content experts conceptualizes a 'borderline' or minimally competent examinee and, for each item, estimates the probability that such an examinee would answer it correctly. Summing those probabilities yields a recommended cut score for each panelist, and averaging across panelists and discussion rounds produces the performance standard. It is among the most widely used standard-setting methods in licensure, certification, and K-12 testing. | Item response theory models the probability that a respondent answers an item correctly (or endorses it) as a function of the respondent's latent trait level and the item's own statistical properties — difficulty, discrimination, and guessing. Unlike classical test theory, IRT places persons and items on the same scale, yielding measurement that is sample-independent for items and test-independent for persons. | Vertical scaling places tests written for different grade levels onto a single continuous score scale so that growth from one grade to the next can be measured in common units. Unlike horizontal equating, which links alternate forms intended to be interchangeable, vertical scaling deliberately links tests of differing difficulty and content to build a developmental continuum spanning, for example, grades 3 through 8. It is the measurement foundation that lets a fourth-grade and a fifth-grade score be subtracted to express how much a student grew. |
| ScholarGateDátová sada ↗ |
|
|
|
|