ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnať metódy

Prezrite si vybrané metódy vedľa seba; riadky, ktoré sa líšia, sú zvýraznené.

Metóda Additive Ratio Assessment×Objektívne váženie pomocou korelácie kritérií a smerodajnej odchýlky×
OdborRozhodovanieRozhodovanie
RodinaMCDMMCDM
Rok vzniku20102010
TvorcaZavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y.
TypAdditive utility ratio (optimal reference row)Correlation-penalised standard-deviation weighting
Pôvodný zdrojZavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. (2010). Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling DOI ↗
Ďalšie názvy
Príbuzné88
ZhrnutieARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CCSD (Criteria Correlation and Standard Deviation objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateDátová sada
  1. v1
  2. 1 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Prejsť na hľadanie Stiahnuť snímky

ScholarGatePorovnať metódy: ARAS · CCSD. Získané 2026-06-17 z https://scholargate.app/sk/compare