Three-Component Model of Organizational Commitment
The Three-Component Model (TCM) of organizational commitment, developed by John Meyer and Natalie Allen, is the dominant framework for understanding why employees stay with and bind themselves to their organizations. Its central claim is that commitment is not one thing but three distinguishable psychological states: affective commitment (an emotional desire to stay — you want to), continuance commitment (the perceived cost of leaving — you need to), and normative commitment (a felt obligation — you ought to). Each is measured by its own subscale and arises from different antecedents, and although all three reduce turnover, they relate very differently to performance, citizenship, and well-being. Allen and Meyer's 1991 paper laid out the conceptualization, and Meyer, Stanley, Herscovitch, and Topolnytsky's 2002 meta-analysis confirmed that the components are distinguishable and have systematically different correlates and consequences.
Исходная запись
Цитирование скопировано дословно из исходной записи метода. На его основании не делается никаких выводов о проверке на уровне утверждения.
- Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89. · DOI 10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
- Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20-52. · DOI 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842
Курируемые утверждения
Утверждения сохранены в реестре доказательств, каждое со своей оценкой.
Этот вид не создает оценку утверждения, если в реестре ее нет.
Связанные методы
Сгенерировано из графа методов и показано как предложенные машиной связи — никаких выводов об утверждениях доказательств не делается.