Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| SPJ Framework× | HCR-20v3× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Судебная психология | Судебная психология |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 2003 | 2013 |
| Автор метода≠ | Stephen D. Hart, Peter R. Kropp, David R. Laws | Kevin S. Douglas, Stephen D. Hart, Christopher D. Webster, et al. |
| Тип≠ | Clinician-Synthesized | Clinician-rated |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., & Laws, D. R. (Eds.). (2003). Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment, and treatment. Guilford Press. link ↗ | Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., Belfrage, H., Guy, L. S., & Wilson, C. M. (2013). HCR-20v3: Assessing risk for violence. Simon Fraser University Mental Health Law Program. link ↗ |
| Другие названия≠ | SPJ, Structured Professional Judgment, SPJ Framework | HCR-20v3, Historical Clinical Risk Management |
| Связанные≠ | 4 | 5 |
| Сводка≠ | The Structured Professional Judgment (SPJ) framework represents a contemporary approach to forensic risk assessment that synthesizes clinical judgment with empirical evidence of risk factors. Rather than producing a numerical score, SPJ guides clinicians through systematic evaluation of case-specific evidence to arrive at a structured, transparent categorical risk judgment. SPJ has become the preferred methodology in many forensic settings globally and underlies instruments such as the HCR-20v3 (violence risk) and sexual offender assessment protocols. | The HCR-20v3 is a structured professional judgment framework developed by Douglas, Hart, and colleagues for the assessment of risk for violence among adolescents and adults in mental health, criminal justice, and forensic settings. Published in 2013, it represents the third version of one of the most widely validated risk assessment instruments in forensic psychology, synthesizing clinical judgment with empirical evidence of violence risk factors. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|