ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Spatial Propensity Score Matching×Пространственная двойная робастная оценка×
ОбластьПричинно-следственный выводПричинно-следственный вывод
СемействоRegression modelRegression model
Год появления2000s2010s–2020s
Автор методаExtension of Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983) PSM to spatial settings; spatial adaptation developed in applied econometrics and epidemiology literature from the 2000s onwardExtension of Robins, Rotnitzky & Zhao (1994) doubly robust framework to spatial settings; developed in spatial epidemiology and econometrics literature
ТипQuasi-experimental matching estimatorSemiparametric causal estimator
Основополагающий источникRosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗Papadogeorgou, G., Mealli, F., & Zigler, C. M. (2019). Causal inference with interfering units for cluster and population level treatment allocation programs. Biometrics, 75(3), 778-787. DOI ↗
Другие названияSpatial PSM, Geospatial PSM, Spatially-adjusted propensity score matching, Geographic propensity score matchingSpatial DR, Spatial AIPW, Spatial augmented IPW, Doubly robust spatial causal estimation
Связанные65
СводкаSpatial Propensity Score Matching (Spatial PSM) extends the classic propensity score matching framework to settings where units are embedded in geographic space and treatment assignment or outcomes may be spatially correlated. By incorporating spatial covariates and adjacency structure into the propensity model and matching procedure, it produces causal estimates that account for geographic confounding and spillover effects.Spatial doubly robust estimation is a semiparametric causal inference method that combines propensity score weighting with outcome regression modeling — providing protection against misspecification of either component — while explicitly accounting for spatial autocorrelation among units. It extends the classical augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW) estimator to settings where treatment assignment and outcomes are geographically clustered or spatially dependent.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Spatial Propensity Score Matching · Spatial Doubly Robust Estimation. Получено 2026-06-17 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare