Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Краткая форма номологической валидности× | Конфирматорный факторный анализ (КФА)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Психометрия | Психометрия |
| Семейство | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Год появления≠ | 1955 (concept); 2000 (short-form context) | 1969 |
| Автор метода≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept); Smith et al. for short-form application | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| Тип≠ | Validity assessment technique | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия | nomological validity of abbreviated scales, short-scale construct validity, nomological network validity, abbreviated form external validity | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| Связанные | 4 | 4 |
| Сводка≠ | Short form nomological validity examines whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale preserves the pattern of theoretically expected correlations with conceptually related and unrelated constructs. It is a cornerstone step in justifying the use of a shortened instrument in research and applied settings. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|