ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

ROUGH-MABAC×CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation×
ОбластьПринятие решенийПринятие решений
СемействоMCDMMCDM
Год появления20191995
Автор методаJia, F., Liu, Y., Wang, X.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
ТипIF-Rough outranking/ranking — Intuitionistic Fuzzy Rough Number (membership μ, non-membership ν)Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Основополагающий источникJia, F., Liu, Y., Wang, X. (2019). An extended MABAC method for multi-criteria group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy rough numbers. Expert Systems with Applications DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Другие названия
Связанные88
СводкаROUGH-MABAC (Rough-MABAC — Rough extension of MABAC) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Jia, F., Liu, Y., Wang, X. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 1 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: ROUGH-MABAC · CRITIC. Получено 2026-06-17 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare