Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Робастное моделирование структурными уравнениями× | Конфирматорный факторный анализ (КФА)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область≠ | Статистика | Психометрия |
| Семейство | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Год появления≠ | 1994 | 1969 |
| Автор метода≠ | Albert Satorra & Peter M. Bentler | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| Тип≠ | Latent variable / path model with robust inference | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Satorra, A. & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis (pp. 399–419). Sage. link ↗ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия | Robust SEM, SEM with robust standard errors, Satorra-Bentler SEM, non-normal SEM | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| Связанные≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Сводка≠ | Robust structural equation modeling (Robust SEM) applies the full SEM framework — simultaneous estimation of measurement and structural relations among latent variables — while using corrected test statistics and sandwich standard errors that remain valid when observed data depart from multivariate normality. The Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-square is the most widely used correction. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|