Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Робастное взвешивание на основе оценки склонности× | Метод подбора на основе оценки склонности× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область≠ | Причинно-следственный вывод | Статистика исследований |
| Семейство≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 1994–2019 | 1983 |
| Автор метода≠ | Robins, Rotnitzky, & Zhao (foundational augmented IPW); Zhao, Small, & Bhattacharya (sensitivity-robust IPW) | Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin |
| Тип≠ | Robust causal weighting estimator | Method |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Robins, J. M., Rotnitzky, A., & Zhao, L. P. (1994). Estimation of regression coefficients when some regressors are not always observed. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89(427), 846-866. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия≠ | robust PSW, robust IPW, robustness-augmented propensity score weighting, misspecification-robust weighting | PSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance |
| Связанные≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Сводка≠ | Robust Propensity Score Weighting extends standard inverse probability weighting by incorporating safeguards against misspecification of the propensity score model and extreme weights. It combines techniques such as weight trimming, overlap weighting, or augmented outcome models to ensure that causal effect estimates remain reliable even when the propensity score model is imperfectly specified. | Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|