Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Робастный конджойнт-анализ× | Конджойнт-анализ (Conjoint Analysis)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область≠ | Статистика | Планирование эксперимента |
| Семейство≠ | Latent structure | Hypothesis test |
| Год появления≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1978 |
| Автор метода≠ | Adaptations developed by robust statistics researchers building on Green and Srinivasan's conjoint framework | Paul E. Green & V. Srinivasan |
| Тип≠ | Preference decomposition / stated preference | Decomposition-based utility estimation |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Croux, C., Filzmoser, P., & Oliveira, M. R. (2007). Algorithms for Projection-Pursuit Robust Principal Component Analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 87(2), 218–225. DOI ↗ | Green, P.E. & Srinivasan, V. (1978). Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(2), 103–123. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия≠ | robust CA, outlier-resistant conjoint analysis, robust stated preference analysis | CBC conjoint, choice-based conjoint, adaptive conjoint analysis, full-profile conjoint |
| Связанные≠ | 4 | 6 |
| Сводка≠ | Robust conjoint analysis decomposes respondent preferences for multi-attribute products or services into part-worth utilities while guarding against the distorting influence of outlying ratings or unusual respondents. It adapts classical conjoint estimation with robust regression or robust aggregation techniques so that conclusions about attribute importance remain trustworthy even when a minority of evaluations deviate markedly from the majority. | Conjoint analysis is a preference-measurement technique that decomposes overall product evaluations into the separate utility values — called part-worths — that respondents assign to each attribute level. Formalised by Green and Srinivasan in their seminal 1978 Journal of Consumer Research paper, the method has become the dominant tool in marketing research and product design for quantifying what buyers truly trade off when they choose between options. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|