Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Мотивационный опросник для чтения (MRQ)× | Шкала вовлеченности студентов× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Педагогическая психология | Педагогическая психология |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 2000 | 2004 |
| Автор метода≠ | Allan Wigfield, John Guthrie | Jennifer Fredricks, Phyllis Blumenfeld, Alison Paris |
| Тип≠ | Reading motivation assessment | Multidimensional engagement assessment |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 3, pp. 403-422). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. link ↗ | Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия | MRQ, Reading Motivation Scale | SES, Academic Engagement Measure |
| Связанные | 4 | 4 |
| Сводка≠ | The Motivation for Reading Questionnaire (MRQ) is a self-report instrument assessing students' motivation to read and engagement with reading activities. Developed by Wigfield and Guthrie (2000), it measures both intrinsic motivation (reading for enjoyment and understanding) and extrinsic motivation (reading for grades or to avoid punishment), along with beliefs about reading efficacy and value. Reading motivation is a primary predictor of reading comprehension, frequency, and lifetime literacy engagement. | The Student Engagement Scale (SES) measures the extent to which students are actively involved in academic and social aspects of school or university life. Grounded in Fredricks et al.'s multidimensional framework, the instrument assesses behavioral engagement (participation, attendance, effort), emotional engagement (interest, belonging, enthusiasm), and cognitive engagement (mental effort, deep thinking, persistence). High engagement is consistently associated with better learning outcomes and well-being. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|