ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Оценка программы×Дизайн-ориентированные исследования (Design-Based Research, DBR)×
ОбластьПолевые методыПолевые методы
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления1960s–1970s (Scriven 1967; Stufflebeam CIPP model 1971)1992
Автор методаMichael Scriven; Daniel Stufflebeam; Peter RossiAnn L. Brown and Allan Collins (independently, 1992)
ТипApplied evaluation methodologyInterventionist qualitative-quantitative mixed methodology
Основополагающий источникRossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761908944Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178. DOI ↗
Другие названияevaluation research, program assessment, educational evaluation, systematic program evaluationDBR, design research, design experiment, educational design research
Связанные36
СводкаProgram evaluation is a systematic, empirically grounded process of collecting and analyzing information about a program to determine its merit, worth, or significance. Applied across education, public health, social services, and policy, it addresses questions such as whether a program is reaching its target population, whether it is being implemented as designed, and whether it is producing the intended outcomes. It draws on both quantitative and qualitative methods and serves accountability, improvement, or knowledge-generation purposes.Design-based research (DBR) is an iterative, interventionist methodology that simultaneously designs educational interventions and builds theory about how and why those interventions work in authentic, complex settings. Originating in Ann Brown's 1992 classroom experiments and Allan Collins's parallel work, DBR treats the learning environment as both the object of study and the site of theory generation, cycling through design, enactment, analysis, and redesign until both practical improvement and theoretical insight are achieved.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Program Evaluation · Design-based Research. Получено 2026-06-15 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare