ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Хищнические журналы и издательства×Модели публикации в открытом доступе×
ОбластьЭтика публикацийЭтика публикаций
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления20102002
Автор методаJeffrey Beall (University of Colorado Denver); international research communityBudapest Open Access Initiative (2002); open science movement
ТипFrameworkStandard
Основополагающий источникBeall, J. (2010). Predatory Open-Access Scholarly Publishers. The Charleston Advisor, 11(4), 10–17. link ↗Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002, revised 2012). Budapest Open Access Initiative. link ↗
Другие названияPredatory Publishing, Fake Journals, Pay-to-Publish SchemesOA Publishing, Gold Open Access, Green Open Access, Diamond OA
Связанные44
СводкаPredatory journals are fake academic publishers that exploit the open-access model by charging authors publication fees without providing peer review, editorial oversight, or quality control. Coined by librarian Jeffrey Beall in 2010, the term describes publishers that prioritize profit over scientific integrity, accepting nearly all submissions (regardless of quality), using deceptive marketing (claiming high impact factors, faking indexing, using names similar to established journals), and often hosting work that would not survive peer review. Publishing in predatory journals damages an author's credibility and wastes research dissemination efforts.Open access (OA) publishing removes subscription paywalls, making research freely available to all readers online without subscription fees. The Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002) defined OA as the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, and link research freely. Multiple OA models exist: Gold OA (immediate free access, often author-funded via APCs), Green OA (free self-archiving in repositories), and Diamond OA (free to both authors and readers). OA expands research impact, enables global participation in science, and aligns with public funding mandates. However, OA models vary in sustainability and are sometimes exploited by predatory publishers.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 3 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Predatory Journals and Publishers · Open Access Publishing Models. Получено 2026-06-18 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare