ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Тестирование инвариантности порядковых измерений×Конфирматорный факторный анализ (КФА)×
ОбластьПсихометрияПсихометрия
СемействоLatent structureLatent structure
Год появления1984–20111969
Автор методаRoger Millsap; Bengt MuthénKarl Gustav Jöreskog
ТипMulti-group model comparisonHypothesis-testing latent variable model
Основополагающий источникMillsap, R. E. (2011). Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance. Routledge. ISBN: 978-1848728936Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗
Другие названияordinal MI, measurement invariance for ordinal data, ordinal CFA invariance, categorical measurement invarianceCFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis
Связанные64
СводкаOrdinal measurement invariance testing evaluates whether a multi-group confirmatory factor model holds equivalent measurement properties across groups when scale items are ordinal — such as Likert-type response scales. It uses polychoric correlations and categorical estimators (WLSMV/DWLS) rather than Pearson-based methods, correcting the systematic bias that arises when ordinal data are treated as continuous.Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Ordinal Measurement Invariance · Confirmatory factor analysis. Получено 2026-06-19 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare