Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Анализ порядковых пунктов× | Порядковый исследовательский факторный анализ× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Психометрия | Психометрия |
| Семейство | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Год появления≠ | 1950s–1980s | 1978–1984 |
| Автор метода≠ | Classical test theory tradition (Guilford, Nunnally, and others) | Bengt Muthén |
| Тип≠ | Item-level diagnostic | Latent variable / dimension reduction |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-0070474659 | Flora, D. B. & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 466–491. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия | item analysis for ordinal data, polytomous item analysis, Likert item analysis, OIA | ordinal factor analysis, polychoric EFA, categorical EFA, EFA for ordinal data |
| Связанные≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Сводка≠ | Ordinal item analysis evaluates each individual item in a rating-scale or Likert-type instrument using descriptive and correlational statistics suited to ordered categorical response formats. It guides item selection and refinement by flagging items with problematic difficulty, poor discrimination, or low corrected item-total correlations before reliability and validity studies proceed. | Ordinal exploratory factor analysis discovers latent factors underlying a set of ordinal items — typically Likert scales — by computing polychoric correlations among the items and then applying a weighted least squares estimator. It avoids the distortions that arise when continuous EFA methods are naively applied to ordered categorical responses. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|