Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Оценка ординальной содержательной валидности× | Эксплораторный факторный анализ (ЭФА)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область≠ | Психометрия | Статистика |
| Семейство | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Год появления≠ | 2003 | — |
| Автор метода≠ | Wynd, Schmidt & Schaefer | — |
| Тип≠ | Scale validation / content validity | Latent variable / dimension reduction |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Wynd, C. A., Schmidt, B., & Schaefer, M. A. (2003). Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(5), 508–518. DOI ↗ | Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C. & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия≠ | ordinal CVI, Likert-scale content validity, ordinal expert rating validity, graded content validity | common factor analysis, açımlayıcı faktör analizi, factor analysis |
| Связанные | 4 | 4 |
| Сводка≠ | Ordinal content validity replaces the traditional binary (yes/no) expert relevance judgment with a graded, Likert-type rating scale, allowing richer expert opinion to be captured when evaluating whether scale items adequately represent the intended construct domain. | Exploratory factor analysis reduces a large set of observed variables into a smaller number of latent common factors. It is widely used in scale development and psychometrics to uncover the dimensional structure that underlies a set of correlated items, without specifying that structure in advance. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|