Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Нейросетевой поиск архитектур× | Метод опорных векторов (классификация)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область≠ | Глубокое обучение | Машинное обучение |
| Семейство | Machine learning | Machine learning |
| Год появления≠ | 2017 | 1995 |
| Автор метода≠ | Zoph, B. & Le, Q.V. | Cortes, C. & Vapnik, V. |
| Тип≠ | Automated architecture optimization (deep learning) | Maximum-margin classifier (kernel method) |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Zoph, B. & Le, Q.V. (2017). Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learning. ICLR. link ↗ | Cortes, C. & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-Vector Networks. Machine Learning, 20, 273–297. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия | Nöral Mimari Arama (NAS), NAS, automated architecture design, differentiable architecture search | Destek Vektör Makinesi (SVM — Sınıflandırma), support-vector network, SVM classifier, maximum-margin classifier |
| Связанные | 5 | 5 |
| Сводка≠ | Neural Architecture Search (NAS), introduced by Zoph and Le in 2017, automatically optimizes architectural decisions such as a network's depth, width, and connection structure instead of hand-designing them. Leading methods in the field include DARTS, ENAS, and Once-for-All. | The Support Vector Machine, introduced by Corinna Cortes and Vladimir Vapnik in 1995, is a classifier that finds the optimal separating hyperplane between classes in a high-dimensional space. It chooses the boundary that leaves the widest possible margin to the nearest training points, which makes its decisions robust on new data. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|