ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Множественная импутация×Метод подбора на основе оценки склонности×
ОбластьСтатистикаСтатистика исследований
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления19871983
Автор методаDonald B. RubinPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
ТипMissing-data handling procedureMethod
Основополагающий источникRubin, D.B. (1987). Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Wiley. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Другие названияMICE, Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations, Çoklu Atama (Multiple Imputation — MICE)PSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Связанные13
СводкаMultiple Imputation (MI), formally introduced by Donald B. Rubin in 1987, is a principled statistical procedure for handling missing data. Rather than replacing each missing value once, MI fills the gaps m times — each time drawing plausible values from the posterior predictive distribution of the missing data — producing m complete datasets. Each dataset is analysed independently, and the results are combined into a single set of estimates using Rubin's pooling rules. The MICE variant (Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations), popularised by van Buuren and Groothuis-Oudshoorn (2011), extends the approach to mixed variable types by imputing each variable in turn through a sequence of conditional regression models.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Multiple Imputation · Propensity Score Matching. Получено 2026-06-17 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare