Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Когортное исследование с участием нескольких центров× | Многоцентровое рандомизированное клиническое исследование× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Эпидемиология | Эпидемиология |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | Mid-to-late 20th century (widespread adoption 1970s–1990s) | 1970s–1980s (widespread adoption for large-scale efficacy trials) |
| Автор метода≠ | Developed incrementally through large collaborative epidemiological projects (e.g., Framingham Heart Study consortium expansions, 1948 onward; EPIC study, 1992) | Evolved from single-center RCT methodology; consolidated through landmark trials such as the MRC streptomycin trial (1948) and large cardiovascular mega-trials of the 1970s–1980s |
| Тип≠ | Observational longitudinal study | Interventional experimental design |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641 | Friedman, L. M., Furberg, C. D., DeMets, D. L., Reboussin, D. M., & Granger, C. B. (2015). Fundamentals of Clinical Trials (5th ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-3319185385 |
| Другие названия | multisite cohort study, multi-centre cohort, collaborative cohort study, pooled cohort study | multi-site RCT, multicenter RCT, multinational randomized trial, multicenter controlled trial |
| Связанные | 6 | 6 |
| Сводка≠ | A multicenter cohort study follows defined groups of participants at two or more geographically or institutionally distinct sites over time to estimate incidence, identify risk factors, and quantify associations between exposures and outcomes. By pooling data from multiple centers, it achieves statistical power and population diversity that single-site designs cannot match, making it the workhorse of large-scale epidemiological and clinical research. | A multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT) is an experimental study in which eligible participants are randomly assigned to intervention or control arms simultaneously across two or more clinical sites. By combining the rigor of randomization with enrollment from geographically or institutionally diverse centers, this design produces large samples and externally valid effect estimates that single-center trials rarely achieve. It is the regulatory gold standard for confirmatory efficacy and safety evaluation of new treatments. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|