ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Многогрупповая конвергентная валидность×Оценка дискриминантной валидности в многогрупповых исследованиях×
ОбластьПсихометрияПсихометрия
СемействоLatent structureLatent structure
Год появления1981 / 20001981 (foundational criterion); multi-group extension 1990s–2000s
Автор методаFornell & Larcker (convergent validity criteria); Vandenberg & Lance (multi-group extension)Fornell & Larcker (for the AVE-based criterion); extended to multi-group settings by the SEM invariance literature
ТипValidity assessment procedureValidity assessment / model comparison
Основополагающий источникFornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. DOI ↗Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. DOI ↗
Другие названияcross-group convergent validity, multi-sample convergent validity, MGCFA convergent validity, AVE across groupscross-group discriminant validity, multi-sample discriminant validity, MGDV, discriminant validity across groups
Связанные65
СводкаMulti-group convergent validity examines whether items purported to measure the same latent construct relate strongly to that construct consistently across distinct subgroups such as demographic categories, cultures, or experimental conditions. It extends single-sample convergent validity checks into a comparative multi-group confirmatory factor analysis framework.Multi-group discriminant validity assessment tests whether constructs measured by a scale are empirically distinct not just in one sample but consistently across two or more groups (e.g., cultures, genders, age cohorts). It extends standard discriminant validity criteria — such as the AVE rule and the HTMT ratio — into a multi-group confirmatory factor analysis framework to verify that conceptual distinctness is replicable across subpopulations.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Multi-group convergent validity · Multi-group discriminant validity. Получено 2026-06-17 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare