Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Метарегрессия× | Сетевой метаанализ× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область≠ | Метаанализ | Синтез доказательств |
| Семейство≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления | 2002 | 2002 |
| Автор метода≠ | Simon Thompson & Julian Higgins | Lumley (2002) |
| Тип≠ | Weighted regression for effect-size heterogeneity | Method |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Thompson, S. G., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2002). How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1559–1573. DOI ↗ | Lumley, T. (2002). Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. Statistics in Medicine, 21(16), 2313–2324. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия≠ | Meta-Analytic Regression, Weighted Regression in Meta-Analysis, Moderator Analysis, Meta-regresyon | Mixed Treatment Comparison, MTC, Indirect Comparison Meta-Analysis |
| Связанные≠ | 2 | 1 |
| Сводка≠ | Meta-regression is a statistical technique that extends conventional meta-analysis by regressing study-level effect sizes on one or more study characteristics (moderators) to explain between-study heterogeneity. Formalized by Thompson and Higgins in 2002, it uses weighted least squares — weighting each study by the inverse of its variance — within a mixed-effects framework, allowing researchers to identify which study features systematically account for variation in observed effects across the literature. | Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a systematic method for comparing multiple interventions simultaneously within a single analytical framework, incorporating both direct evidence (head-to-head trials) and indirect evidence (comparisons via common comparators). First formalized by Lumley in 2002, NMA allows researchers to rank treatments and quantify comparative effectiveness even when some treatment pairs have never been directly studied. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|