ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Методология фокус-групп×Методы синтеза качественных данных×
ОбластьКачественные исследованияКачественные исследования
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления19561988
Автор методаRobert K. Merton and Paul F. LazarsfeldGeorge Noblit and Dwight Hare
ТипMethodMethod
Основополагающий источникKrueger, R. A. (1994). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803954366Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803931725
Другие названияFGD, focus group discussion, group interviewqualitative meta-synthesis, meta-ethnography, thematic synthesis, systematic review of qualitative studies
Связанные44
СводкаFocus group discussions are a qualitative research method in which a trained moderator guides a small group (typically 6–12 participants) through structured or semi-structured discussion of a specific topic or product. Developed by Merton and Lazarsfeld in the 1950s for market research, focus groups are now widely used in health sciences, education, social sciences, and policy research. The method leverages group interaction to generate rich, contextual insights that individual interviews may not reveal.Qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) is a systematic method for combining and interpreting findings from multiple qualitative research studies to generate higher-level understanding and theory. Different approaches—meta-ethnography, thematic synthesis, meta-narrative review, critical interpretive synthesis—each have distinct philosophical underpinnings and analytical procedures. Introduced by Noblit and Hare (1988) with meta-ethnography, qualitative synthesis has evolved alongside systematic reviews of quantitative research. Unlike quantitative meta-analysis, which pools numerical effect sizes, qualitative synthesis integrates concepts, themes, and interpretations from primary studies, identifying patterns, conflicts, and emergent theory. QES is increasingly used in health research, social sciences, and education to understand complex phenomena, translate research into practice, and identify gaps in evidence.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 4 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Focus Group Methodology · Qualitative Evidence Synthesis Methods. Получено 2026-06-18 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare