ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Конечный метод полос (FSM)×Геомеханика методом граничных элементов×Инкрементальный динамический анализ×
ОбластьГражданское строительствоГражданское строительствоГражданское строительство
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления197619782002
Автор методаY. K. CheungCarlos Alberto BrebbiaDimitrios Vamvatsikos and C. Allin Cornell
ТипReduced-dimension numerical method for prismatic structuresMesh-less numerical method for geomechanical problemsIntensity-based dynamic analysis for fragility assessment
Основополагающий источникCheung, Y. K. (1976). Finite Strip Method in Structural Analysis. Pergamon Press. ISBN: 0-08-020191-5Brebbia, C. A. (1978). The Boundary Element Method for Engineers. Pentech Press. ISBN: 0-08-020191-5Vamvatsikos, D., & Cornell, C. A. (2002). Incremental dynamic analysis of seismic performance of structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 31(3), 491-514. DOI ↗
Другие названияFSM, Strip method, Semi-analytical finite elementBoundary element method, BEM analysis, Indirect methodsIDA, Intensity-based analysis, Fragility curve development
Связанные333
СводкаThe finite strip method (FSM) is a semi-analytical numerical approach for analyzing prismatic or cylindrical structures by dividing them into strips in one direction and using analytical or exact solutions in the perpendicular direction. Developed by Cheung in 1976, FSM reduces computational cost and often provides superior accuracy for structures with regular geometry along one axis.The boundary element method (BEM) for geomechanics is a numerical approach that solves problems by discretizing only the boundary of the domain, using analytical solutions for the interior. Introduced by Brebbia in 1978 and refined for geotechnical applications by Crouch and Starfield, BEM is particularly effective for infinite or semi-infinite domains (underground excavations, foundations, rock masses) where finite element methods are impractical.Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) is a method that runs time-history analyses on a structure with a single ground motion record, progressively increasing the intensity until the structure reaches a specified performance level or collapses. Introduced by Vamvatsikos and Cornell in 2002, this approach efficiently generates fragility curves relating earthquake intensity to structural damage and collapse probability.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 3 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Finite Strip Method · BEM Geomechanics · Incremental Dynamic Analysis. Получено 2026-06-18 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare