Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Геомеханика методом граничных элементов× | Инкрементальный динамический анализ× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Гражданское строительство | Гражданское строительство |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 1978 | 2002 |
| Автор метода≠ | Carlos Alberto Brebbia | Dimitrios Vamvatsikos and C. Allin Cornell |
| Тип≠ | Mesh-less numerical method for geomechanical problems | Intensity-based dynamic analysis for fragility assessment |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Brebbia, C. A. (1978). The Boundary Element Method for Engineers. Pentech Press. ISBN: 0-08-020191-5 | Vamvatsikos, D., & Cornell, C. A. (2002). Incremental dynamic analysis of seismic performance of structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 31(3), 491-514. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия | Boundary element method, BEM analysis, Indirect methods | IDA, Intensity-based analysis, Fragility curve development |
| Связанные | 3 | 3 |
| Сводка≠ | The boundary element method (BEM) for geomechanics is a numerical approach that solves problems by discretizing only the boundary of the domain, using analytical solutions for the interior. Introduced by Brebbia in 1978 and refined for geotechnical applications by Crouch and Starfield, BEM is particularly effective for infinite or semi-infinite domains (underground excavations, foundations, rock masses) where finite element methods are impractical. | Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) is a method that runs time-history analyses on a structure with a single ground motion record, progressively increasing the intensity until the structure reaches a specified performance level or collapses. Introduced by Vamvatsikos and Cornell in 2002, this approach efficiently generates fragility curves relating earthquake intensity to structural damage and collapse probability. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|