Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Цифровая автоэтнография× | Автоэтнография× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Качественные методы | Качественные методы |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 2000s–2010s | Late 20th century (term coined 1979; method consolidated 1990s–2000s) |
| Автор метода≠ | Annette Markham; expanded through netnography work by Robert Kozinets | Carolyn Ellis, Arthur Bochner, Norman Denzin (prominent theorists); David Hayano coined the term in 1979 |
| Тип≠ | Qualitative self-reflexive design | Qualitative research method |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Markham, A. N. (2013). Undermining 'data': A critical examination of a core term in scientific inquiry. First Monday, 18(10). link ↗ | Ellis, C. (2004). The Ethnographic I: A Methodological Novel about Autoethnography. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759100947 |
| Другие названия | online autoethnography, virtual autoethnography, digital self-ethnography, networked autoethnography | auto-ethnography, AE, personal narrative research, self-ethnography |
| Связанные≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Сводка≠ | Digital autoethnography is a qualitative research design in which the researcher systematically examines their own lived experience within digital environments — social media platforms, online communities, gaming worlds, digital workplaces, or other networked spaces — to illuminate broader cultural and social phenomena. Combining autoethnography's first-person reflexivity with the study of digital life, it treats personal digital traces, interactions, and self-representations as primary data. | Autoethnography is a qualitative research method in which the researcher uses systematic self-reflection and personal narrative to examine their own experiences within a cultural, social, or organizational context. By treating the self as both subject and instrument, autoethnography connects individual lived experience to broader cultural patterns, making personal stories analytically and socially significant. It bridges autobiography and ethnography, producing accounts that are simultaneously evocative and scholarly. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|