Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Критический анализ учебных программ× | Оценка программы× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область | Полевые методы | Полевые методы |
| Семейство | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Год появления≠ | 1970s–1980s | 1960s–1970s (Scriven 1967; Stufflebeam CIPP model 1971) |
| Автор метода≠ | Michael W. Apple; Henry A. Giroux; Paulo Freire (critical pedagogy foundations) | Michael Scriven; Daniel Stufflebeam; Peter Rossi |
| Тип≠ | Critical qualitative research approach | Applied evaluation methodology |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Apple, M. W. (1979). Ideology and Curriculum. Routledge & Kegan Paul. ISBN: 978-0415909242 | Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761908944 |
| Другие названия | CCA, critical curriculum inquiry, critical curriculum critique, curriculum critique | evaluation research, program assessment, educational evaluation, systematic program evaluation |
| Связанные≠ | 5 | 3 |
| Сводка≠ | Critical curriculum analysis examines educational curricula — their content, organisation, and underlying assumptions — through a critical theory lens. Drawing on the work of Apple, Giroux, and Freire, it asks whose knowledge counts, whose interests the curriculum serves, and how schooling reproduces or challenges social inequalities. Rather than treating curriculum as neutral, it treats it as an ideologically saturated artifact shaped by relations of power, race, class, and gender. | Program evaluation is a systematic, empirically grounded process of collecting and analyzing information about a program to determine its merit, worth, or significance. Applied across education, public health, social services, and policy, it addresses questions such as whether a program is reaching its target population, whether it is being implemented as designed, and whether it is producing the intended outcomes. It draws on both quantitative and qualitative methods and serves accountability, improvement, or knowledge-generation purposes. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|