Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Содержательная валидность× | Эксплораторный факторный анализ (ЭФА)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Область≠ | Психометрия | Статистика |
| Семейство | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Год появления≠ | 1975 | — |
| Автор метода≠ | C. H. Lawshe (quantitative framework); earlier qualitative traditions in educational measurement | — |
| Тип≠ | Validity evidence / expert judgement procedure | Latent variable / dimension reduction |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗ | Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C. & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия≠ | content-related validity, logical validity, face validity, content validation | common factor analysis, açımlayıcı faktör analizi, factor analysis |
| Связанные≠ | 6 | 4 |
| Сводка≠ | Content validity is evidence that a measurement instrument adequately samples the full domain of the construct it is intended to measure. It is established through systematic expert review and quantified with indices such as Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Lynn's Content Validity Index (CVI), making it the foundational validity step in scale development. | Exploratory factor analysis reduces a large set of observed variables into a smaller number of latent common factors. It is widely used in scale development and psychometrics to uncover the dimensional structure that underlies a set of correlated items, without specifying that structure in advance. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|