ScholarGate
Ассистент

Сравнение методов

Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.

Байесовский анализ разнообразия микробиома×Сетевой анализ разнообразия микробиома×
ОбластьБиоинформатикаБиоинформатика
СемействоProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Год появления2010s (Dirichlet-Multinomial approach formalized ~2012; extensions ongoing)2012
Автор методаIan Holmes, Katie Harris, Christopher Quince (Dirichlet-Multinomial Mixture framework, 2012); broader Bayesian microbiome modeling communityFaust, Raes, Friedman, Alm and colleagues
ТипProbabilistic/Bayesian pipeline for compositional count dataIntegrative bioinformatics pipeline
Основополагающий источникHolmes, I., Harris, K., & Quince, C. (2012). Dirichlet Multinomial Mixtures: Generative Models for Microbial Metagenomics. PLOS ONE, 7(2), e30126. link ↗Friedman, J., & Alm, E. J. (2012). Inferring correlation networks from genomic survey data. PLoS Computational Biology, 8(9), e1002687. DOI ↗
Другие названияBayesian microbiome profiling, Dirichlet-Multinomial microbiome analysis, Bayesian alpha/beta diversity, probabilistic microbiome diversitymicrobial co-occurrence network analysis, microbiome network ecology, ecological network-based diversity, NBMDA
Связанные55
СводкаBayesian microbiome diversity analysis applies probabilistic models — chiefly Dirichlet-Multinomial and related hierarchical frameworks — to 16S rRNA or shotgun metagenomic count data to estimate alpha-diversity (within-sample richness and evenness) and beta-diversity (between-sample compositional differences) while propagating uncertainty through the entire inference chain. Unlike frequentist rarefaction-based approaches, Bayesian methods treat taxon counts as draws from a latent composition, enabling credible intervals on diversity metrics and principled comparison across groups with unequal sequencing depth.Network-based microbiome diversity analysis integrates graph-theoretic co-occurrence network inference with classical alpha- and beta-diversity metrics to characterize the structural organization of microbial communities. Rather than treating taxa as independent entities, the method models pairwise microbial associations as edges in a network, enabling identification of keystone taxa, community modules, and ecological interaction patterns that simple diversity indices cannot detect.
ScholarGateНабор данных
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Источники
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти к поиску Скачать слайды

ScholarGateСравнение методов: Bayesian Microbiome Diversity Analysis · Network-based microbiome diversity analysis. Получено 2026-06-17 из https://scholargate.app/ru/compare