Сравнение методов
Просматривайте выбранные методы рядом; строки с различиями подсвечены.
| Сбалансированная точность× | F1-мера× | Точность× | Полнота (Чувствительность)× | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Область | Оценка моделей | Оценка моделей | Оценка моделей | Оценка моделей |
| Семейство | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM |
| Год появления≠ | 2010 | 1979 | 20th century | 20th century |
| Автор метода≠ | Brodersen, Ong, Stephan, and Buhmann | C. J. van Rijsbergen | Historical statistical foundations | Historical statistical foundations |
| Тип | Evaluation metric | Evaluation metric | Evaluation metric | Evaluation metric |
| Основополагающий источник≠ | Brodersen, K. H., Ong, C. S., Stephan, K. E., & Buhmann, J. M. (2010). The balanced accuracy and its posterior distribution. 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), 3121-3124. DOI ↗ | van Rijsbergen, C. J. (1979). Information Retrieval (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. link ↗ | Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗ | Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗ |
| Другие названия≠ | Average Recall, Equal-weight Average Sensitivity | F-measure, Harmonic Mean | Positive Predictive Value, PPV | Sensitivity, True Positive Rate, TPR |
| Связанные | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Сводка≠ | Balanced accuracy is the average of recall values computed for each class separately. It corrects for class imbalance by giving equal weight to the performance on each class, regardless of class frequency in the dataset. | The F1-score is the harmonic mean of precision and recall, providing a single metric that balances both concerns. It was introduced by van Rijsbergen in information retrieval and has become a standard metric for evaluating classification models where both precision and recall are important. | Precision measures the proportion of positive predictions that were actually correct. It answers the question: 'Of all the cases we predicted as positive, how many were truly positive?' Precision is critical in scenarios where false positives are costly. | Recall measures the proportion of actual positive cases that were correctly identified by the classifier. It answers the question: 'Of all the cases that were truly positive, how many did we find?' Recall is critical in scenarios where missing positive cases is costly. |
| ScholarGateНабор данных ↗ |
|
|
|
|