Glock-Stark Religiosity Dimensions
The Glock-Stark framework, set out in Charles Glock and Rodney Stark's 1965 Religion and Society in Tension, recast religiosity from a single global trait into five analytically distinct dimensions of religious commitment: belief (ideological), practice (ritualistic), experience (experiential), knowledge (intellectual), and consequences (the effects of religion on everyday conduct). The core claim is that an individual can rank high on one dimension and low on another, so a one-number measure of 'how religious' someone is conceals more than it reveals. Operationally, each dimension is tapped by its own cluster of survey items, scaled separately, and the correlations among the dimensions are themselves an object of study. This multidimensional measurement model became the template for nearly all later psychometric work on religiousness.
Citește metoda completă
Autentifică-te cu un cont gratuit pentru a citi această secțiune.
Harta metodelor
Vecinătatea metodelor înrudite — selectați un nod pentru a explora.
Surse
- Glock, C. Y., & Stark, R. (1965). Religion and Society in Tension. Chicago: Rand McNally. link ↗
- Huber, S., & Huber, O. W. (2012). The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS). Religions, 3(3), 710-724. DOI: 10.3390/rel3030710 ↗
Cum se citează această pagină
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Glock-Stark Multidimensional Religiosity (Five Dimensions of Religious Commitment). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ro/religious-studies/glock-stark-religiosity
Ce metodă?
Așezați această metodă lângă cele mai apropiate rude și citiți-le alăturat — biblioteca pune cărțile pe masă; alegerea vă aparține.
- Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS)Religious Studies↔ compară
- Faith Maturity ScaleReligious Studies↔ compară
- Religious Orientation Scale (ROS)Religious Studies↔ compară
Citat de
Metode similare
Ai observat o problemă pe această pagină? Raportează sau sugerează o corectură →