Democratic Norms Support Measurement
This approach measures how committed ordinary citizens are to democratic norms by observing the price they are willing to pay to uphold them. Rather than asking abstractly whether people value democracy, Matthew Graham and Milan Svolik's 2020 candidate-choice design confronts voters with a co-partisan candidate who violates a democratic principle and estimates how much electoral support that violation costs. Their finding that most Americans will tolerate undemocratic behavior by their own side when partisanship and policy stakes are high reframed the study of democratic backsliding around revealed, not professed, commitment. Christopher Claassen's parallel work links aggregate diffuse support for democracy to whether democracies survive.
Citește metoda completă
Autentifică-te cu un cont gratuit pentru a citi această secțiune.
Harta metodelor
Vecinătatea metodelor înrudite — selectați un nod pentru a explora.
Surse
- Graham, M. H., & Svolik, M. W. (2020). Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 392-409. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055420000052 ↗
- Claassen, C. (2020). Does Public Support Help Democracy Survive? American Journal of Political Science, 64(1), 118-134. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12452 ↗
Cum se citează această pagină
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Measuring Mass Support for Democratic Norms (Candidate-Choice Tradeoff Design). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ro/political-psychology/democratic-norms-support-scale
Ce metodă?
Așezați această metodă lângă cele mai apropiate rude și citiți-le alăturat — biblioteca pune cărțile pe masă; alegerea vă aparține.
- Elite Cue ExperimentPsihologie politică↔ compară
- Scala de încredere politicăPsihologie politică↔ compară
- Support for Political Violence MeasurePsihologie politică↔ compară
Citat de
Metode similare
Ai observat o problemă pe această pagină? Raportează sau sugerează o corectură →