Distributive Politics Analysis
Distributive politics analysis studies how governments allocate divisible public spending — grants, transfers, projects, and pork — across districts and groups to maximize electoral support. Two competing theories anchor the field. The swing-voter logic, formalized by Avinash Dixit and John Londregan in 1996 (building on Lindbeck and Weibull), holds that parties target marginal districts where votes are most responsive to spending. The core-voter logic, associated with Gary Cox and Mathew McCubbins's 1986 redistributive-game model, holds that parties instead reward loyal supporters whose preferences and reliability they know best. The empirical method is a regression of observed transfers on electoral characteristics — district marginality and partisan alignment — to test which targeting strategy the data reveal.
Citește metoda completă
Autentifică-te cu un cont gratuit pentru a citi această secțiune.
Harta metodelor
Vecinătatea metodelor înrudite — selectați un nod pentru a explora.
Surse
- Cox, G. W., & McCubbins, M. D. (1986). Electoral Politics as a Redistributive Game. The Journal of Politics, 48(2), 370-389. DOI: 10.2307/2131098 ↗
- Dixit, A., & Londregan, J. (1996). The Determinants of Success of Special Interests in Redistributive Politics. The Journal of Politics, 58(4), 1132-1155. DOI: 10.2307/2960152 ↗
Cum se citează această pagină
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Distributive Politics Analysis (Targeting of Public Spending). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ro/political-economy/distributive-politics-analysis
Ce metodă?
Așezați această metodă lângă cele mai apropiate rude și citiți-le alăturat — biblioteca pune cărțile pe masă; alegerea vă aparține.
- Economic Voting AnalysisPolitical Economy↔ compară
- Redistribution Preference AnalysisPolitical Economy↔ compară
- Vote Buying AnalysisPolitical Economy↔ compară
Citat de
Metode similare
Ai observat o problemă pe această pagină? Raportează sau sugerează o corectură →