Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Extensia Z-Number a metodei EDAS× | Proces Ierarhic Analitic× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Luarea deciziilor | Luarea deciziilor |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2011 | 1980 |
| Autorul original≠ | Zadeh, L. A. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Tip≠ | Z-Number outranking/ranking — Z-Number (Z = (A, B): restriction A, reliability B; both fuzzy) | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Zadeh, L. A. (2011). A note on Z-numbers. Information Sciences DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 |
| Denumiri alternative | — | — |
| Înrudite | 8 | 8 |
| Rezumat≠ | Z-EDAS (Z-Number extension of EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zadeh, L. A. in 2011. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|