Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Extensia Z-Number a metodei COPRAS× | CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Luarea deciziilor | Luarea deciziilor |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2011 | 1995 |
| Autorul original≠ | Zadeh, L. A. | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. |
| Tip≠ | Z-Number outranking/ranking — Z-Number (Z = (A, B): restriction A, reliability B; both fuzzy) | Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Zadeh, L. A. (2011). A note on Z-numbers. Information Sciences DOI ↗ | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | — | — |
| Înrudite | 8 | 8 |
| Rezumat≠ | Z-COPRAS (Z-Number extension of COPRAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zadeh, L. A. in 2011. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|