Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Scala de xenofobie× | Scala Valorilor Democratice× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Sociologie politică | Sociologie politică |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2009–2016 | 1999–2015 |
| Autorul original≠ | Alin Ceobanu, Xavier Escandell, Elke Schlueter | Russell Dalton, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Christian Welzel |
| Tip | Self-report questionnaire | Self-report questionnaire |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Ceobanu, A. M., & Escandell, X. (2010). Comparative analyses of public attitudes toward immigrants and immigration using multinational survey data: The European Social Survey. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(6), 953-969. link ↗ | Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford University Press. link ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | XS, Anti-Immigration Attitude Scale | DVS, Democratic Attitudes Scale |
| Înrudite≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Rezumat≠ | The Xenophobia Scale measures fear, discomfort, or prejudice toward foreign nationals and immigrants. Unlike immigration policy preferences (which can reflect economic or pragmatic considerations), xenophobia captures affective and attitudinal dimensions—emotional threat perception, negative stereotypes, and cultural distance. Developed by migration scholars including Ceobanu and Escandell, it is essential for understanding antiforeign sentiment and discriminatory attitudes across diverse contexts. | The Democratic Values Scale measures commitment to core principles of democratic governance including free speech, rule of law, fair elections, protection of minorities, and transparent institutions. Rather than measuring support for democracy as a system (which is nearly universal in principle), it captures depth of commitment to democratic norms, tolerance for dissent, and willingness to protect rights of political opponents. Developed by comparative political scientists including Dalton, Klingemann, and Welzel, it reveals psychological foundations of democratic stability. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|