Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Studiu de caz unic prin elicitație vizuală× | Cercetarea Acțiune Participativă (CAP)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Calitativ | Calitativ |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | Photo elicitation established 1950s–1960s; integration with single case study consolidated 1990s–2000s | 1940s (Lewin); PAR as distinct tradition formalised ~1970s–1980s |
| Autorul original≠ | Combination: Douglas Harper (visual/photo elicitation); Robert K. Yin (case study methodology) | Kurt Lewin (action research foundations, 1940s); systematised for participatory contexts by Orlando Fals Borda, Paulo Freire, and William Foote Whyte |
| Tip≠ | Qualitative research design combining visual data elicitation with bounded single-case inquiry | Qualitative research method |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26. DOI ↗ | Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Springer. link ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | photo-elicitation case study, image-based single case study, visual interview case study, VE-SCS | PAR, community-based participatory research, collaborative action research, participatory inquiry |
| Înrudite≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Rezumat≠ | Visual elicitation single case study is a qualitative design that embeds photo or image elicitation techniques within a bounded, in-depth investigation of a single case — a person, community, program, or event. Photographs, drawings, or participant-produced images are introduced into interviews to prompt richer, more vivid accounts than verbal questioning alone can generate, while the single case study frame provides the disciplined contextual analysis needed to understand the case as a whole. | Participatory Action Research (PAR) is a qualitative, community-centred methodology in which researchers and community members collaborate as co-investigators to identify a shared problem, take deliberate action, observe outcomes, and reflect critically on results — cycling iteratively until meaningful change is achieved. Unlike conventional research that studies people from the outside, PAR treats participants as active agents who co-own the research process, the knowledge produced, and the practical interventions that follow. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|