Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| UTA*× | Procesul Analitic al Rețelei (AHP cu feedback și interdependențe)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Luarea deciziilor | Luarea deciziilor |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1985 | 1996 |
| Autorul original≠ | Siskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Tip≠ | Additive utility disaggregation — LP from ordinal reference judgements | Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure) |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Siskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. (1985). UTASTAR: An ordinal regression method for building additive value functions. Investigación Operativa link ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8 |
| Denumiri alternative | — | — |
| Înrudite | 8 | 8 |
| Rezumat≠ | UTASTAR (UTA* — Additive utility disaggregation from reference ranking (revised UTA)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Siskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. in 1985. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|