Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Eșantionarea cazului tipic× | Eșantionare intenționată× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Metodologia anchetelor | Metodologia anchetelor |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1980s (systematized in Patton 1990/2002) | Formalized ~1980–1990 |
| Autorul original≠ | Michael Quinn Patton | Michael Quinn Patton (systematic articulation); roots in early qualitative inquiry |
| Tip≠ | Purposive qualitative sampling strategy | Non-probability sampling strategy |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711 | Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803937796 |
| Denumiri alternative | typical case selection, modal case sampling, representative case sampling, average case sampling | judgmental sampling, selective sampling, criterion-based sampling, purposeful sampling |
| Înrudite≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Rezumat≠ | Typical case sampling is a purposive strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects cases that represent what is ordinary, normal, or most common within a target group. Rather than seeking outliers or the widest possible variation, the goal is to illustrate and communicate what a typical experience, program, or phenomenon looks like to stakeholders or audiences unfamiliar with it. The strategy is widely used in qualitative evaluation research and program reporting. | Purposive sampling is a non-probability strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects participants, documents, or cases that are information-rich with respect to the research question. Rather than drawing units at random, the researcher applies explicit criteria aligned with the study's purpose, maximising the depth and relevance of the data collected. It is the default sampling logic in most qualitative research designs and is also used in mixed-methods and applied evaluative work. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|