Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Scala de satisfacție în telemedicină× | Scala de Implicare a Pacientului× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Informatică medicală | Informatică medicală |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2009 | 2004 |
| Autorul original≠ | Multiple researchers; consensus measure | Judith H. Hibbard, Janice Stockard, Ellen R. Mahoney, Martin Tusler |
| Tip | Self-report questionnaire | Self-report questionnaire |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Or, Z., & Kartak, F. (2009). Review of the empirical literature on telemedicine in the OECD countries: Does telemedicine improve outcomes? In M. Rechel, B. Goddard (Eds.), Improving healthcare quality in Europe. WHO Regional Office for Europe. link ↗ | Hibbard, J. H., Stockard, J., Mahoney, E. R., & Tusler, M. (2004). Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): Conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Services Research, 39(4), 1005–1026. DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | TSS, Telemedicine Satisfaction | PES, Patient Engagement |
| Înrudite | 3 | 3 |
| Rezumat≠ | The Telemedicine Satisfaction Scale measures patient satisfaction with remote clinical encounters, assessing perceptions of communication quality, technical usability, provider competence, and perceived benefit. While no single universal scale dominates the literature, core satisfaction domains—connection quality, provider accessibility, clinical effectiveness, and likelihood to recommend—are consistently measured across telemedicine studies to evaluate user acceptance and identify barriers to adoption. | The Patient Engagement Scale measures the degree to which patients take active responsibility for managing their health and healthcare. Developed by Hibbard and colleagues (2004), the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) operationalizes engagement as a progression from awareness of health issues through confident self-management, capturing the psychological, behavioural, and confidence dimensions essential for patient participation in shared decision-making and chronic disease management. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|