ScholarGate
Asistent

Compară metode

Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.

Target Complaint Scaling×Single-System Design×
DomeniuSocial WorkSocial Work
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Anul apariției19662009
Autorul originalCarolyn C. Battle, Jerome D. Frank & colleagues (Johns Hopkins)Martin Bloom, Joel Fischer & John G. Orme (codification in social work)
TipIndividualized outcome measure based on client-elicited presenting complaintsTime-series design for evaluating intervention with a single client system
Sursa seminalăBattle, C. C., Imber, S. D., Hoehn-Saric, R., Stone, A. R., Nash, E. R., & Frank, J. D. (1966). Target complaints as criteria of improvement. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 20(1), 184–192. DOI ↗Bloom, M., Fischer, J., & Orme, J. G. (2009). Evaluating Practice: Guidelines for the Accountable Professional (6th ed.). Pearson/Allyn & Bacon. ISBN: 9780205458066
Denumiri alternativeTarget Complaints, Target Complaint Method, Battle Target Complaints, Target Problem ScalingSingle-Subject Design, Single-Case Design, N-of-1 Design, Single-System Evaluation
Înrudite44
RezumatTarget complaint scaling is an individualized outcome measure in which the client names the specific complaints that brought them to treatment, each complaint is rated for severity at the outset and again at follow-up, and the change in those ratings indexes improvement. Introduced by Carolyn Battle, Jerome Frank, and colleagues at Johns Hopkins in 1966, it grounds outcome measurement in the client's own presenting problems rather than a fixed questionnaire, making it an early and influential model for person-centered, idiographic outcome assessment in psychotherapy and social work.A single-system design is a time-series approach to evaluating practice in which a single client system — an individual, family, group, or organization — is measured repeatedly on a clearly defined target before and during (and sometimes after) an intervention. By tracking the same system over time rather than comparing a treatment group to a control group, it lets a practitioner judge whether their own intervention is associated with change in the people they actually serve. It is the methodological backbone of the 'accountable professional' tradition codified by Bloom, Fischer, and Orme.
ScholarGateSet de date
  1. v1
  2. 2 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED

Mergi la căutare Descarcă prezentarea

ScholarGateCompară metode: Target Complaint Scaling · Single-System Design. Preluat la 2026-06-24 de pe https://scholargate.app/ro/compare