Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Testul SURE pentru screeningul conflictului decizional× | Instrumentul de Abilitare a Pacientului× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Îngrijire centrată pe pacient | Îngrijire centrată pe pacient |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2010 | 1998 |
| Autorul original≠ | Annette O'Connor | J. G. Howie |
| Tip | Patient-reported | Patient-reported |
| Sursa seminală≠ | O'Connor, A. M. (2010). Using the Decisional Conflict Scale to evaluate a decision aid. In A. Edwards & G. Elwyn (Eds.), Shared Decision Making in Health Care (pp. 424-438). Oxford University Press. link ↗ | Howie, J. G., Heaney, D. J., Maxwell, M., & Zwanenberg, D. (1998). A comparison of a Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) against two other consultations outcome measures. British Journal of General Practice, 48(427), 1211-1216. link ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | SURE Screening Tool, Decisional Conflict Screener | PEI, Patient Enablement Score |
| Înrudite | 4 | 4 |
| Rezumat≠ | The SURE Test is a four-item screening questionnaire designed to rapidly identify patients experiencing decisional conflict—uncertainty or difficulty in making healthcare decisions. Developed by Annette O'Connor and colleagues, the SURE Test is an abbreviated, practical version of the longer Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), created to detect patients who may benefit from decision support or additional counselling. It is widely used in clinical and research settings for quick, valid screening. | The Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) is a brief, validated six-item questionnaire that measures the degree to which a clinical consultation leaves the patient feeling more capable of understanding and managing their health condition. Developed by Howie and colleagues in 1998, the PEI assesses whether the consultation helped the patient understand their problem, cope with their illness, and manage their health more effectively. The scale captures the empowering effect of good clinical practice and is widely used in general practice research, quality improvement, and studies evaluating patient-centered and collaborative consultation styles. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|