Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Static-99 Assessment× | Risk-Needs Assessment× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Criminology | Criminology |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2000 | 1990 |
| Autorul original≠ | R. Karl Hanson & David Thornton | Donald A. Andrews & James Bonta |
| Tip≠ | Actuarial sexual recidivism risk instrument | Structured offender risk/needs assessment framework |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24(1), 119–136. DOI ↗ | Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The Psychology of Criminal Conduct (5th ed.). Routledge/Anderson. ISBN: 9781422463291 |
| Denumiri alternative≠ | Static-99, Static-99R, Static 99, Static-99 Sexual Recidivism Risk Tool | RNR Assessment, Risk-Need-Responsivity Model, Risk/Needs Assessment, Criminogenic Needs Assessment |
| Înrudite | 4 | 4 |
| Rezumat≠ | Static-99, and its age-revised form Static-99R, is the most widely used actuarial instrument for estimating sexual and violent recidivism risk among adult male sexual offenders. It scores ten unchanging, historical risk factors into a total that maps onto a risk category and, via published norm tables, an estimated probability of reoffending — providing a standardized, evidence-based anchor for forensic risk decisions. | Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) assessment is the dominant framework for structured assessment of justice-involved people, scoring an offender's criminogenic risk and needs to decide who receives intervention, what should be targeted, and how it should be delivered. Formulated by Donald Andrews and James Bonta, it organizes the strongest predictors of reoffending into the 'Central Eight' and converts them into a total risk score that guides the intensity of correctional supervision and treatment. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|