ScholarGate
Asistent

Compară metode

Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.

Social Construction of Technology×Social Shaping of Technology×
DomeniuScience Technology StudiesScience Technology Studies
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Anul apariției19841985
Autorul originalTrevor Pinch & Wiebe BijkerDonald MacKenzie, Judy Wajcman, Robin Williams, David Edge
TipConstructivist theory of technological developmentAnalytic tradition and method in the sociology of technology
Sursa seminalăPinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399-441. DOI ↗MacKenzie, D., & Wajcman, J. (Eds.). (1999). The Social Shaping of Technology (2nd ed.). Open University Press. ISBN: 9780335199136
Denumiri alternativeSCOT, Social constructivism of technology, Interpretive flexibility analysisSST analysis, Social shaping approach, Shaping of technology framework
Înrudite44
RezumatThe Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) is a constructivist framework holding that technological artefacts are shaped by the interpretations and negotiations of relevant social groups rather than by technical logic alone. Introduced by Trevor Pinch and Wiebe Bijker in 1984, it shows that an artefact has 'interpretive flexibility'—different groups see different problems and solutions in it—until a process of closure stabilises one design as the obvious one.The Social Shaping of Technology (SST) is the umbrella tradition in the sociology of technology that rejects technological determinism and argues that the content and trajectory of technical artefacts are themselves outcomes of social, economic, organisational, and political choices. Rather than treating technology as an autonomous force whose effects society must merely absorb, SST analysis opens the 'black box' of design and shows that at every stage—conception, development, standardisation, and use—things could have been, and were, decided otherwise.
ScholarGateSet de date
  1. v1
  2. 2 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Surse
  3. PUBLISHED

Mergi la căutare Descarcă prezentarea

ScholarGateCompară metode: Social Construction of Technology · Social Shaping of Technology. Preluat la 2026-06-25 de pe https://scholargate.app/ro/compare