Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Analiza fiabilității formei scurte× | Fiabilitatea test-retest× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Psihometrie | Psihometrie |
| Familie | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1904 |
| Autorul original≠ | Conventional practice; codified notably by Smith, McCarthy & Anderson (2000) and Stanton et al. (2002) | Karl Pearson |
| Tip≠ | Scale development / psychometric evaluation | Reliability estimate |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Stanton, J. M., Sinar, E. F., Balzer, W. K. & Smith, P. C. (2002). Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self-report scales. Personnel Psychology, 55(1), 167–194. DOI ↗ | Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-0070478497 |
| Denumiri alternative | abbreviated scale reliability, short-form validation, scale shortening, item reduction reliability | stability reliability, temporal stability, repeatability coefficient, TRT reliability |
| Înrudite≠ | 6 | 4 |
| Rezumat≠ | Short-form reliability analysis evaluates whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale maintains acceptable internal consistency, validity, and structural integrity after items are removed. It is used in survey and assessment research to create briefer instruments that reduce respondent burden without sacrificing measurement quality. | Test-retest reliability quantifies the temporal consistency of a measure by correlating scores obtained from the same participants on two separate occasions. It is a cornerstone of psychometric validation, directly indicating whether a scale or instrument yields stable scores when the underlying construct has not changed. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|