Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Validitate Nomologică a Formei Scurte× | Validitate Convergentă× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Psihometrie | Psihometrie |
| Familie | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1955 (concept); 2000 (short-form context) | 1959 |
| Autorul original≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept); Smith et al. for short-form application | Donald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske |
| Tip≠ | Validity assessment technique | Validity evidence / construct validation |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative≠ | nomological validity of abbreviated scales, short-scale construct validity, nomological network validity, abbreviated form external validity | convergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity |
| Înrudite | 4 | 4 |
| Rezumat≠ | Short form nomological validity examines whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale preserves the pattern of theoretically expected correlations with conceptually related and unrelated constructs. It is a cornerstone step in justifying the use of a shortened instrument in research and applied settings. | Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|