Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Analiza itemilor de scurtă durată× | Dezvoltarea Scalelor× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Psihometrie | Psihometrie |
| Familie | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1991–1995 |
| Autorul original≠ | Psychometric tradition; methodological articulation by Smith, McCarthy & Anderson (2000) | Multiple contributors; codified by Robert DeVellis and Lee Anna Clark & David Watson |
| Tip≠ | Item selection and evaluation procedure | Multi-step methodological framework |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗ | DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale Development: Theory and Applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1506341569 |
| Denumiri alternative | abbreviated scale item analysis, short-scale item evaluation, item screening for short forms, SFIA | questionnaire construction, instrument development, measurement scale construction, psychometric scale building |
| Înrudite≠ | 4 | 5 |
| Rezumat≠ | Short-form item analysis is the systematic psychometric evaluation and selection of items when constructing an abbreviated version of a longer measurement instrument. It applies classical and modern item-analysis criteria — item-total correlations, reliability estimates, and factor structure — to identify the smallest item subset that preserves the original scale's psychometric integrity. | Scale development is a structured, multi-step process for creating psychometrically sound measurement instruments that capture latent psychological constructs. It encompasses construct definition, item generation, expert review, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, reliability estimation, and validity evidence collection — producing a final set of items suitable for quantitative research. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|