Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Analiza de Sensibilitate pentru Biasul Ascuns (Limitele Rosenbaum / E-value)× | Efectul Mediu Local al Tratamentului (LATE / CACE)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Inferență cauzală | Inferență cauzală |
| Familie | Regression model | Regression model |
| Anul apariției≠ | 2002 | 1994 |
| Autorul original≠ | Paul R. Rosenbaum (bounds); Tyler J. VanderWeele & Peng Ding (E-value) | Imbens & Angrist (1994); Angrist, Imbens & Rubin (1996) |
| Tip≠ | Sensitivity analysis for causal inference | Instrumental-variable causal estimand |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational Studies (2nd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-0387989679 | Imbens, G. W., & Angrist, J. D. (1994). Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects. Econometrica, 62(2), 467-475. DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative≠ | Rosenbaum bounds, E-value, hidden bias sensitivity analysis, unmeasured confounding sensitivity | LATE, CACE, complier average causal effect, Yerel Ortalama Tedavi Etkisi (LATE / CACE) |
| Înrudite | 5 | 5 |
| Rezumat≠ | Sensitivity analysis for hidden bias is a family of methods that quantify how strongly an unmeasured confounder would have to operate before it could overturn a causal conclusion drawn from observational data. It was crystallised by Paul Rosenbaum's sensitivity bounds (2002) and extended by VanderWeele and Ding's E-value (2017). | The Local Average Treatment Effect is an instrumental-variable estimand, introduced by Imbens and Angrist (1994) and formalised with Rubin (1996), that recovers the average treatment effect for the subpopulation of compliers — units whose treatment status is actually moved by the instrument. It is closely tied to compliance analysis. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|